<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Darryl Woodford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dpwoodford.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dpwoodford.net</link>
	<description>Life, Academia and Current Projects</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 05:19:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Privacy? What Privacy? Blizzard insisting on real names for forum, in-game profiles by Darryl Woodford</title>
		<link>http://www.dpwoodford.net/2010/07/privacy-what-privacy-blizzard-insisting-on-real-names-for-forum-in-game-profiles/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Darryl Woodford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 05:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dpwoodford.net/?p=339#comment-31</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m told they&#039;ve already partially retracted it, for employees only. Given the uproar and the mainstream press attention I can&#039;t see them sticking with it either. The in-game thing seems to have got far less attention, so it will be interesting to see if that eventually falls too...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m told they&#8217;ve already partially retracted it, for employees only. Given the uproar and the mainstream press attention I can&#8217;t see them sticking with it either. The in-game thing seems to have got far less attention, so it will be interesting to see if that eventually falls too&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Privacy? What Privacy? Blizzard insisting on real names for forum, in-game profiles by Sebastian</title>
		<link>http://www.dpwoodford.net/2010/07/privacy-what-privacy-blizzard-insisting-on-real-names-for-forum-in-game-profiles/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 12:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dpwoodford.net/?p=339#comment-28</guid>
		<description>This has to be one of the most crazy and outlandish moves I&#039;ve ever seen. It reeks of Activision trying to &#039;monetize&#039; (&#039;socialnetworkize&#039;?) the WoW playerbase.

It&#039;s completely unreal, untenable -- and I&#039;m almost certain it will get withdrawn in lieu of &#039;V2.0... coming soon.&#039;

As you say, a nickname for cross-server communication would be more than enough. Just having it CONFIGURABLE would be enough! As it stands, you can see the real names of your friends-of-friends in WoW. No warnings, no options... that&#039;s just how it is.

Crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has to be one of the most crazy and outlandish moves I&#8217;ve ever seen. It reeks of Activision trying to &#8216;monetize&#8217; (&#8216;socialnetworkize&#8217;?) the WoW playerbase.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s completely unreal, untenable &#8212; and I&#8217;m almost certain it will get withdrawn in lieu of &#8216;V2.0&#8230; coming soon.&#8217;</p>
<p>As you say, a nickname for cross-server communication would be more than enough. Just having it CONFIGURABLE would be enough! As it stands, you can see the real names of your friends-of-friends in WoW. No warnings, no options&#8230; that&#8217;s just how it is.</p>
<p>Crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
